epilogue, evoking, perhaps, Molly Bloom's final soliloquy, with a
hint of affirmation that asks the reader to carry the existential
banner through, and perhaps from, the ruins.
The obvious temptation, of course (and this
review has hardly avoided it) is to keep marrying Bernard's achievement
to the modernist vocabulary that made it possible and that remains,
to varying degrees, the aesthetic context for any attempt at literate
experimentalism. But it's just as possible to connect a work as conceptually
and verbally potent as A Spy in the Ruins to the quintessence
of 19th-century American realism - specifically, to the meditative
watershed that is Henry James' "The Beast in the Jungle." Notwithstanding
the paralleling titles of the two works, what links them is a more
fundamental notion, that of a consciousness straining to
|
|
define itself as pure and self-validating amidst the structures of
convention.
In James' short story, the protagonist has
lived with an intimation that an apocalyptic, life-altering event
awaits him, coiled to spring like a jungle beast, though he has no
idea when or what form it may take. Allied with a woman who agrees
to "watch" with him, he does not live so much as marks time toward
the great moment he believes sets him apart from the rest of society's
somnam-bulists, and, of course - there's an obviousness to this that
we, as jaundiced 21st-century readers, can't fail to pick up on -
his existential realization comes too late.
Bernard's novel likewise chides the civilized
soul who struggles with a deterministic self-conscious-
ness in a universe that is always, teasingly, beyond ultimate comprehension,
as the small
|